Communist University of the Catalan Countries "The Berlin Wall, 20 years later
We recommend the mini-video jcpennies series jcpennies on "Capital" by Karl Marx, published recently in Argentina. It consists of four chapters that you can view via this website http://contraimagen.org.ar/marx-no-Vuelto-manifesto-comunista/ jcpennies
There are events that mark a change of era. The release of the atomic jcpennies bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki divides the twentieth jcpennies century to the middle separating before and after a nuclear age. The Revolution of 1917, in turn, started and scored with his authoritarian socialist project the "short twentieth century" would end in 1989 with the fall of the Iron Curtain. The fall of the Berlin Wall did not envy anything in relevance to these events. The collapse of the concrete wall that separated the western part of the eastern part of Berlin closed the Short Twentieth Century (1917-1989) and gave way to a new historical era marked by globalization.
As a historical event, the fall of the Berlin Wall left behind a period marked by the threat of an escalation between the superpowers USA and USSR could have ended in disaster nuclear. However, his greatest interest probably lies in that event as a future event and, as such, scores and marks the time from then until the present, projecting beyond even the today. In light of what was then launched even an event on the scale of September 11 continues to reveal itself as a secondary event. Hence the importance of returning the gaze toward the two decades elapsed and try to reflect on what has happened since. This is not only because by the inevitable "re aware of the past" (Aufarbeitung der Vergangenheit), but also drawing on the analysis of the trend that the fall of the Berlin Wall made possible as a reference point from which to draw diagnosis of the situation.
In the text that follows will address some of the main keys with which to reinterpret the event that marked this changing era. We will address first the flashing agenciament as modern mythology. The whole story then organized into a single narrative policy jcpennies (neo) liberal maintained its force largely, although not all have avoided the question (if, for example, the oft-repeated "End of History") .
Second, we examine the nature of the political regime of the GDR. To that end, briefly reconsider the ideological nature of the types that are used in comparative politics and his debt to the interpretative schemes of the Cold War. Thus it will be possible to relocate critically analyze configuration command on the basis of Leninist regimes.
Third, we will focus on the role of dissent, its merits (and limitations) under the particular conditions of the institutional regime of East German power. Like the policy subject to the control population (the institution of sovereign power) was incorporated in permanent tension with the "risk of flight" (which among other things made possible the national question), political dissent was set a voltage line with the sovereign power through the "risk of protest" jcpennies to the public (risk igualmente crossed by the national jcpennies question).
Fourth, and directly related to the above, the structural conditions that they prepare the collapse of the GDR. The absence of democratization would be a decisive factor in the failure of the command to ensure their own material bases. The dissociation between the two constitutions would extend well to place the system on the edge of collapse, however, jcpennies be accelerated by changes in the international situation and the effects of the wave of transnational mobilizations underway since the early eighties in Poland and from Hungary in the mid-eighties.
To explain precisely how it produces the collapse of the GDR and the subsequent transition should resume mode-in fifth place-revolutionary regime change. Paradoxically, the year that conservative historians celebrated the second anniversary of the events of 1789 in France requiems for the revolution, the Iron Curtain collapsed by the momentum of a wave of demonstrations in some cases ( including the GDR) would properly be revolutionary.
In this vein, and in sixth place, the national question offers an interpretive key with which to investigate the limits of political calls
We recommend the mini-video jcpennies series jcpennies on "Capital" by Karl Marx, published recently in Argentina. It consists of four chapters that you can view via this website http://contraimagen.org.ar/marx-no-Vuelto-manifesto-comunista/ jcpennies
There are events that mark a change of era. The release of the atomic jcpennies bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki divides the twentieth jcpennies century to the middle separating before and after a nuclear age. The Revolution of 1917, in turn, started and scored with his authoritarian socialist project the "short twentieth century" would end in 1989 with the fall of the Iron Curtain. The fall of the Berlin Wall did not envy anything in relevance to these events. The collapse of the concrete wall that separated the western part of the eastern part of Berlin closed the Short Twentieth Century (1917-1989) and gave way to a new historical era marked by globalization.
As a historical event, the fall of the Berlin Wall left behind a period marked by the threat of an escalation between the superpowers USA and USSR could have ended in disaster nuclear. However, his greatest interest probably lies in that event as a future event and, as such, scores and marks the time from then until the present, projecting beyond even the today. In light of what was then launched even an event on the scale of September 11 continues to reveal itself as a secondary event. Hence the importance of returning the gaze toward the two decades elapsed and try to reflect on what has happened since. This is not only because by the inevitable "re aware of the past" (Aufarbeitung der Vergangenheit), but also drawing on the analysis of the trend that the fall of the Berlin Wall made possible as a reference point from which to draw diagnosis of the situation.
In the text that follows will address some of the main keys with which to reinterpret the event that marked this changing era. We will address first the flashing agenciament as modern mythology. The whole story then organized into a single narrative policy jcpennies (neo) liberal maintained its force largely, although not all have avoided the question (if, for example, the oft-repeated "End of History") .
Second, we examine the nature of the political regime of the GDR. To that end, briefly reconsider the ideological nature of the types that are used in comparative politics and his debt to the interpretative schemes of the Cold War. Thus it will be possible to relocate critically analyze configuration command on the basis of Leninist regimes.
Third, we will focus on the role of dissent, its merits (and limitations) under the particular conditions of the institutional regime of East German power. Like the policy subject to the control population (the institution of sovereign power) was incorporated in permanent tension with the "risk of flight" (which among other things made possible the national question), political dissent was set a voltage line with the sovereign power through the "risk of protest" jcpennies to the public (risk igualmente crossed by the national jcpennies question).
Fourth, and directly related to the above, the structural conditions that they prepare the collapse of the GDR. The absence of democratization would be a decisive factor in the failure of the command to ensure their own material bases. The dissociation between the two constitutions would extend well to place the system on the edge of collapse, however, jcpennies be accelerated by changes in the international situation and the effects of the wave of transnational mobilizations underway since the early eighties in Poland and from Hungary in the mid-eighties.
To explain precisely how it produces the collapse of the GDR and the subsequent transition should resume mode-in fifth place-revolutionary regime change. Paradoxically, the year that conservative historians celebrated the second anniversary of the events of 1789 in France requiems for the revolution, the Iron Curtain collapsed by the momentum of a wave of demonstrations in some cases ( including the GDR) would properly be revolutionary.
In this vein, and in sixth place, the national question offers an interpretive key with which to investigate the limits of political calls
No comments:
Post a Comment